The Two General Theories of Law, Legal Naturalism & Positivism

The social critic may quite commonly use either supposition or both since s/he can be elicit in whether constabulary serves justice, as conceived of within whatever higher(prenominal) truth s/he advocates or may deal to address very directly the question of whether crabby confirming constabulary is in need of change that can be brought about by changes in regularizations--as prescribed in the rule theory of right--and this requires a fundamental knowledge of the legal profitableness underlying the onward motiones of those who, in the social critic's opinion, may be upholding the law for its own sake at the expense of justice.

Legal naive realism describes those diverse theories of law that do not accept kind law as true law and hold that a particular "something other than the affirmatory law [is] the true law and ascribe to it a superior status over the verificatory law" (Sinha 84). The claims of natural law--based on God, nature, virtue, and right reason--have been put precedents in many societies since the invention of the concept of dharma, "the divinely official norm of good conduct," in India 3,500 years ago (Sinha 85). to a greater extent recently natural-law thinking has made a return and in the twentieth century numerous formulations have been put forward that view natural law as "objectively assumption value, as

The Utilitarian approach culminated in capital of Texas's theory that law is "characterized by dominate, sanction, duty, and sovereignty" (Sinha, 185). Austin distinguished between laws of God and human laws, with the former having no juristic importance and the latter including positive laws, "laws properly so-called," and laws of positive morality," which are laws improperly so-called" (Sinha 183). Positive laws are commands dictated down by political superiors or devised by subjects playacting on legal rights they have been given. A command indicates a desire but, unlike other desires, it is enforced by sanctions which are applied when one fails in one's "duty to obey the command" (Sinha 184).

But law, unlike other commands with which one may be able to force others to comply, is set by a sovereign--either an exclusive or a body of persons so empowered.

Hart's rule theory of law is based on his perception of basic patriarchal rules of obligation (restricting "free use of violence, theft, and deception") which possess authorized defects as a system of law for which three strict secondary rules need to be applied (Sinha 188). Primary rules chuck up the sponge for un certain(prenominal)ty of social organisation and a secondary rule of actualization acknowledges rules of behavior as authoritative. Primary rules are also unchanging in nature and the secondary rule of change "empowers a person or a group of persons to introduce new-made primary rules for the conduct of the life of the community" (Sinha 188). And primary rules hold up from the "inefficiency of diffuse social pressure" as their only factor of being maintained--a problem remedied by the secondary rule of adjudication whereby certain individuals are authorized to determine breaches of primary rules in particular types of situations (Sinha 188).

The historian who contrasts the legal naturalism of Roman and ecclesiastical law (which produces a clear picture of the primary rationale for the structure of medieval society) with the emergent commercial law sees the
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!