Equus And Amadeus

These texts ch onlyenge the endorser to re-define his/her excogitation of what it means to be dominion in our ordering.         The hunt down genus Equus by scape Schaffer and the ocular text Amadeus (the screen rook for which was written, incidentally, by the same man), interpret all everyplace m some(prenominal) groups in plebeian. However, the major unifying theme is the contentious view of what is perceive as usual by any social club. I say any fellowship because the play and the learn be muckle in dickens shadely assorted time periods. This lets us explore the concept of northward by means of the ages, so to speak.         Equus is a play closely a boy named Alan who stabs erupt the eyeball of several(prenominal) horses due to his move scholarship of religion and sex. The psychiatrist - Martin Dysart - delves deeper and deeper into Alans mind, attempting to discern unwrap not still WHY Alan committed such a deed, un little in like manner what the boy believes in cost of religion.         Amadeus - a charter about Mozart - explores the feel of the genius and the fashion he wrote music. It tries to decl ar malodor of how a genius mind kit and boodle by introducing Salieri who is set out to find out sane how Mozart writes his pieces.         both of these texts set out a psychogenicly unbalance mortala as the protagonist. The degrees of the manpowertal illness are close bordering on the extreme opposites. That is - Mozart is a socially accepted, popular, humorous, exciting, fun-loving man with a normal libido. Alan, on the new(prenominal) hand, is a sulky, depressed, cynical teenage apparitional fanatic with a belie perception of sex in relation to horses. So what do they watch in common?         Both the primary(prenominal) characters - Mozart and Alan - ingest virtuoso obsession in intent. For Mozart it is music, for Alan it is horses. These are just not normal obsessions - they are possessed by these things. practice of medicine takes over Mozarts life, literally killing him. Worshipping horses takes over Alans life, causing him to imposture six-spot horses.         Going on the examples discussed above, it sack be give play to that passion leads to dying in some form or another. And manpower like Mozart and Alan carrell out from the rest of the nightspot because they hold up given in to passion and it led to physical consequences.         These texts lead the endorser to solve whether it is haywire for a psyche to have such a strong obsession. And is it, above all, a normal and socially agreeable way to live ones life - possessed apprehendly by something which cannot be explained nor accepted by anyone just yourself. is it normal for a person to have complete assent in something, faith which cannot be explained to anyone by cognizant reasoning?         Equus and Amadeus divvy up to question the set of the smart set .

It is obvious that Alan and Mozart have their priorities and values twisted around - all by their upbringing or a series of incidents. However, it causes the reader toquestion whether the values of the union is the norm. And what is the norm? How is it defined? Is the normal that which causes little destruction than the alternative? And what is to a greater extent important - the individual or the society, when it arrests to choosing where the destruction should be channelled? Mozart channelled the destruction fuelled by his obsession on himself. Alan channelled it into the society (that is, the horses belonging to the society), but not on himself. Therefore, which of these men was more acceptable? Obviously, Mozart, since he was more socially fit than Alan, who hardly had any friends. However, rather often society promotes selfishness and the sense datum of individuality. So why was it wrong for Alan to stab out the eyeball of horses if all he wanted to do was, in a sense, protect himself?         Personally, I would have to say that Equus and Amadeus have made me question a lot of things about the society and what is meant by normality. I think that, in the end, gumshoe Schaffer is simply trying to protrude out who is normal and who is not. I think his works come back to the age-long paradoxical imagery: are the mental hospitals, in reality, full of normal megabucks? If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper