        Public Welfare is an important back off system of the coupled States
government. Welfare has its benefits, but the system has pitfalls. Instead of
abolishing welfare as critics of the system suggest, reforms can be made to
correct the problems while government, each on the state or federal level, can
continue to assist the impoverished.
        The border welfare is used to describe a variety of programs that provide
income support and create a safety net for poor individuals and families. Such
benefits accommodate Supplemental Security Income, Medicaid, food stamps, housing
allowances, and serve to Families with Dependent Children. Aid To Families With
Dependent Children (AFDC) enables states to provide cash payments to
children that are deprived of the care or support of a parent. In terms of welfare
reform, this is the program or so often discussed.
        The media has created many myths regarding welfare and the reasons
the system should be do away with. Stating that the majority of new welfare
recipients are poor, single mothers, claims adjudge been made that poor women
bring on more children because of the incentives of welfare benefits. It has been
proven that is no correlativity between womens choice to have children and
welfare benefit levels. Furthermore, for each supererogatory child, a mother can
expect an additional $90 of AFDC benefits, far in like manner low to serve as any type of
incentive. In addition, those states that provide higher benefits do not
necessarily show higher gestate rates among their welfare recipients. Families
receiving AFDC benefits have 1.9 children, just about the identical as the national
average.
(ACLU 1)
        Another myth created by the media concerns the amount of coin spent
and the results. It has been said that after spending billions of dollars since the
mid-1960s on anti-poverty programs, there have been little or no results. To...
The paper lacks in throughly explaining the dear(p) part of welfare, there seems to be more negatives then positives. The author does not argue for his/her position well, an academic audience would chump the essay as a poorly written essay.
many a(prenominal) parts of paper seems to be coppied from another article on welfare that I read. Overall this entire paper take to be re-written, to form a clear arguement.
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment