Caca pupu

They depart record all face-to-face information such address, height, weight, physical characteristics and much more. The close step, after treat the delinquent, is to place a bail or bond on the person. In Ms. Watson case, she ordain probably have to wait to see the Judge the next morning to determine whether or not placing a bail or bond on her is an alternative. This decision often depends on the severity of the offence. after the bail or bond has been placed, it will be fol pitiableed by the arraignment. An arraignment is the low gear appearance an offender will have in court.It is here where they go from beingness a suspect to being a defendant in a criminal case. During the arraignment, the Judge reads the criminal charges bestowed upon the offender, and makes sure the offender check them. If at that moment the accused does not have a lawyer, sacrifice or hired, the Judge will offer to provide one constitute by the court. In our case of study, during this audience Ms . Watson will be told that she is being charged with possession of a controlled core with intent of distribute, and the Judge will ask her if she understands the charges.The arraignment is followed by the prayer bargaining. As we studied during the cartroad of this dissever and, in my case in particular, in my mini paper 2, nearly 95% of cases atomic number 18 disposed by plea bargaining any year. In this case Ms. Watson has the opportunity to plea bargaining to lesser he charges however, for the purpose of this paper I will state that Ms. Watson does not respect to plea bargaining and request criminal trial. After plea bargaining, comes the former hearing. In this process, the public prosecutor tries to convince the Judge that there is enough severalise to demonstrate that a crime was committed.It is at this stage of the case when the prosecutor will prove to the Judge that Ms. Watson committed the crime of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. A criminal trial follows after the preliminary examination hearing has taken place. If Ms. Watson is not satisfied with any plea deals offered to her, she would go to a criminal trial where a Jury decides her fate. During the course of this footstep the prosecution must prove beyond any reasonable head to the Jury that Ms. Watson committed the crime.The last step in the process is the sentencing. If an offender plead finable or was found guilty by a Jury, he or she will be sentenced according to the severity of the crime committed. Here is where Ms. Watson will be sentenced for committing the crime of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. The mandatory lower limit sentences pertaining to federal official narcotics locations have been object of umteen criticisms. In 1991 the United States Sentencing Commission released a document with the mandatory marginal requirements.The statutes described in the aforementioned document were widely criticized becaus e they were considered unjustifiable in some cases were the offender had minimum participation and were barely over the statutory floor (Lynch, 2001). However, in this particular study case, is demonstrated that Ms. Watson was part of a crime that triggered a five to ten year mandatory minimum because she was in possession of a significant amount of cocain. The sentence that Ms. Watson will probably receive is institutionalizing. A charge of possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is a very serious offence in all the states of the U.S. We have to consider many factors for this charge and sentence, such as the criminal history of the offender, the possibility of someone getting hurt, the psychological ground of the accused and others. Because Ms. Watson already had a warrant for her arrest, which makes us think that she had a criminal history, I believe that she should receive a sentence of seven to ten years in prison without the possibility of parole. Crack cocaine is lassie as a Schedule II drug, which means it is highly addictive. Thousands of Americans die each year because of this drug, especially young people.How can we foretell someone to reenter society or reduce recidivism if we dont help them gain a helpful skill before they are released from prison? Most of the inmate population originates from the lowest friendly strata of the country, and have only experienced low quality education, poverty, substance abuse, mental health and many other social issues. If we invest time and reform the educational programs offered in the prison system, we could reform rehabilitation outcomes and as a consequence the number of recidivism cases will exculpate drastically.Making a mistake is human, rehabilitating someone and preventing them from going back to prison is wise. Whats the strongest bring together in the criminal Justice system? I think that plea bargaining is the strongest link of the criminal Justice system. Because new state and fe deral laws have hardened sentencing for criminals, prosecutors have gained greater power to get guilty pleas from defendants, and reduce the number of cases that go to trial. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, in 2003 there were 75,573 cases disposed of in federal district court by trial or plea. Of these, about 95 percent were disposed by plea bargaining.While there are no exact estimates of the proportion of cases that are firm through plea bargaining, scholars estimate that about 90 to 95 percent of both federal and state court cases are resolved through this process (Divers, 2011, p. 3). It is an effective system when dealing with overcrowded courts, and the lengthy costly processes. Besides, prosecutorial discretion usually finds a way to avoid dramatic injustices. During the course of this class I learned a lot about the American criminal Justice system. I could understand a little better(p) the complexity of the system as a whole.